• The Met
  • The Art Renewal Center
  • William Bouguereau

  • My Favorite Art
  • Jeune Fille se Defendant Contre L'amour
    by William Bouguereau

  • Le_ravissement de Psyche
    by William Bouguereau

  • Flagellation de Notre Seigneur Jésus Christ
    by William Bouguereau
My Photo
Name:
Location: Liverpool, NY

"In my house, I'm a big deal. That's all that matters."

email

About The Ultra Rev

Facebook


Free Hit Counters

Powered by Blogger

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Leading Up

A friend of mine introduced me to a new term recently: leading up. I don't really have a precise definition for this term but a quick Google search shows its fairly common just new to me. Essentially, as I've seen it played out in his life and mine, an explanation of leading up could be: Leading up is leading those who are in leadership over you.

That's a tricky thing to do. You can't lead with positional authority and just tell them what to do. You're the subordinate. You can't just be the smarter person who always knows more than they do. Then you'll appear as a threat.

Leading up is about relational maneuvering. One person who mentored me said to me once, "You need to lead this team in such a way that the ideas and pathways you introduce they adopt and think they were their own." That's what you have to do when you lead up.

Leading up could appear arrogant. "How is it that you think you should be in charge?" But truth be told, sometimes you end up working for people who aren't as qualified, or don't have the leadership moxy, or don't have the ingenuity that you do. Sometimes you work for people who are mean, disingenuous, critical or inept. Sometimes you really are smarter and a better leader. All of these require leading up.

Leading up needs to be done in such a way that it does not appear subversive, as if you are attempting a coup. Even if you are. It requires care for those you work for. You need to have theirs and the organization's best interest at heart.

Leading up. My new favorite phrase.

PLEASE NOTE: If you are one of my bosses, this doesn't apply to you.
ALSO NOTE: If you work for me, don't get any ideas.

Comments on "Leading Up"

 

Blogger Luke said ... (7:04 AM, July 13, 2007) : 

"Managing Up" is a phrase that has been around a long time. It means essentially the same thing you spoke of - managing your boss. The old saying is, "everyone gets the boss they deserve," meaning your boss can be as good as you can make him/her or as bad as you are wiling to settle for. Managing up can be a mutually beneficial arrangement, and is especially effective when the boss knows you're doing it and trusts your motivation. Otherwise, even for the best of reasons, it is sneaky and manipulative.

I don't get "leading up", though. Fact of the matter is that leadership isn't management. Leadership is NOT dependant on hierarchical position. Leaders can influence and lead at any and all levels. Leadership is, fundamentally, the ability to attract, influence, and motivate followers. I've seen a lot of natural leaders (and some cultivated ones) who were not in positions of leadership, but who exercised significant leadership anyway - up, down, and across an organization. When these people work for the good of the followers and the organization, it is a good thing. When, instead, they motivate their followers with discontent, gossip, etc., it is a bad thing. A bad leader is still a leader, because they can attract, influence, and motivate people in that direction, too.

So I'd say, manage up, but do it openly. Lead for good from where ever you are in the org chart, and not just up - sideways, too!

 

post a comment